China Proposes Global AI Governance Body Amid U.S. Rivalry

In a strategic move that signals both ambition and strategy, China has unveiled plans to establish a global artificial intelligence (AI) governance body, aimed at shaping the rules and ethics around one of the most transformative technologies of our time.

Announced by Premier Li Qiang at the World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai, the proposal underscores China’s increasing desire to assert influence over global AI development. At its heart, the initiative seeks to address the current fragmented landscape of AI governance, an arena where nations hold starkly different views on oversight, risk, and access.

But behind the diplomatic language and calls for cooperation lies a deeper undercurrent: a geopolitical bid to challenge U.S. dominance in shaping how AI will be used, distributed, and regulated worldwide.

A Call for Shared Development, Not Selective Control

Premier Li emphasized that AI must remain open, shared, and inclusive, cautioning that it risks becoming an “exclusive game” dominated by a few nations or corporations. While he didn’t name names, the veiled reference was hard to miss: the United States and its export restrictions on AI chips and advanced technologies, which have directly targeted China’s ability to scale up its own AI ecosystem.

In contrast, China’s proposed governance framework champions access for the Global South, offering to share AI tools, research, and even chip technologies with developing countries often left on the fringes of technological revolutions. This angle not only enhances China’s soft power but also taps into long-standing frustrations around digital inequality.

The Proposed Structure: Cooperation or Influence?

Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu confirmed that Shanghai could become the headquarters of this proposed international body, which is envisioned as a multilateral, pragmatic institution to coordinate global cooperation on AI. According to China’s foreign ministry, over 30 countries, including South Africa, Germany, Qatar, and Russia, have already engaged in early discussions about joining the initiative.

An action plan has also been made public, inviting contributions from governments, companies, and academic institutions around the world. It includes ideas like building a cross-border open-source AI community, fostering transparency and collaboration beyond national boundaries.

While this inclusive language may appeal to countries seeking a non-Western-led framework, critics are likely to question the intent and independence of any organization headquartered in China, where state influence over tech remains tightly woven into the fabric of innovation.

What Are the Potential Benefits?

On the surface, this initiative could provide a much-needed global platform for AI standardization, ethics, and coordination. The benefits are substantial:

Global inclusion: Developing nations gain access to tools, research, and development support otherwise limited to richer nations.
Cross-border collaboration: The organization could create a hub for international research and policy alignment, mitigating the “Wild West” nature of AI deployment.
Balance to Western frameworks: By presenting an alternative to U.S.-led governance models, the initiative introduces multipolarity in AI ethics and regulation.
Shared infrastructure: Open-source tools and decentralized AI infrastructure may emerge, democratizing participation in AI innovation.

The Drawbacks and Critical Concerns

However, the proposal is far from uncontroversial. Several key risks and drawbacks raise legitimate questions:

Political trust deficit: Western countries may be reluctant to participate in an organization perceived as an instrument of Chinese foreign policy.
Transparency concerns: China’s domestic record on censorship, surveillance, and state control could conflict with global values of open AI.
Duplication and fragmentation: Rather than unifying global efforts, this could further splinter governance, especially if parallel bodies emerge with competing norms.
Exporting surveillance models: Skeptics worry that China might promote its AI frameworks, often criticized for enabling authoritarian surveillance, as global standards.

A Defining Moment in the AI Cold War?

This isn’t just a policy announcement. It’s a strategic play in a growing tech cold war between Washington and Beijing. As the U.S. accelerates its efforts to maintain control over AI infrastructure and chip supply chains, China is moving in a different direction, one that fuses diplomacy, development aid, and ideology into a cohesive AI agenda.

The battle over who writes the rules of artificial intelligence is no longer theoretical. It’s here, unfolding in international summits, chip factories, and open-source forums.

China’s proposal to build a global AI governance body is more than a diplomatic gesture. It’s a declaration of tech sovereignty, a rallying call to the Global South, and a calculated challenge to Western models of AI oversight.

Whether this organization will become a true vehicle for inclusive governance or an extension of China’s influence remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: the future of intelligence is now a global chessboard and China is making its next move.