OpenAI Subpoenas Meta in Musk’s $97B AI Acquisition Battle
The courtroom drama between OpenAI and Elon Musk just got bigger. The ChatGPT creator is now pressing Meta for evidence, claiming Zuckerberg’s company may have been linked to Musk’s massive $97 billion attempt to seize control of the startup.
The Subpoena and Alleged Plot
According to OpenAI’s lawyers, internal communications suggest that Musk’s AI venture, xAI, discussed financing arrangements with Meta in relation to the proposed acquisition of OpenAI earlier this year. The startup claims these records could shed light on whether Meta played a behind-the-scenes role in supporting Musk’s unsolicited bid, which OpenAI firmly rejected in February.
OpenAI is asking the court to compel Meta to hand over documents, after the company initially objected to a subpoena in July. The requested records include not only correspondence about Musk’s takeover attempt but also any internal discussions concerning OpenAI’s restructuring or recapitalization, a central issue in Musk’s lawsuit against the organization.
Musk’s Lawsuit and OpenAI’s Defense
Musk, who co-founded OpenAI in 2015, argues that the company’s 2019 decision to transform its for-profit arm into a public benefit corporation strays from its original mission of ensuring AI benefits humanity. He claims this restructuring paved the way for commercial interests to dominate, enabling moves such as Microsoft’s multibillion-dollar investment.
OpenAI counters that the restructuring was necessary to secure long-term funding and keep pace in the fast-moving AI race. The organization insists that without such moves, it would not have been able to sustain research at the scale required to develop breakthrough models like GPT-4 and beyond.
Meta Pushes Back
Meta has publicly denied signing Musk’s letter of intent or directly backing his takeover bid. In its own court filings, the company argues that any relevant evidence should be available from Musk or xAI directly, not from Meta’s internal discussions.
A spokesperson, Andy Stone, pointed to OpenAI’s own brief, which acknowledges that neither Meta nor Zuckerberg formally supported Musk’s acquisition attempt. Meta’s legal team is now pressing the court to reject OpenAI’s request for additional documents, calling it unnecessary and overly broad.
Meta’s AI Ambitions
Though distancing itself from Musk’s lawsuit, Meta has been fiercely competitive in the AI sector. Once fixated on creating a model to outperform OpenAI’s GPT-4, the company has poured billions into research and infrastructure. This includes a $14 billion investment in Scale AI and high-profile talent acquisitions, such as Shengjia Zhao, a co-creator of ChatGPT who now leads Meta Superintelligence Labs.
Despite this aggressive push, reports suggest Meta’s models have lagged behind newer benchmarks, frustrating Zuckerberg and fueling speculation that partnerships or acquisitions could be on the table.
An Unlikely Alliance?
The prospect of Musk and Zuckerberg aligning, even hypothetically, is a twist few in Silicon Valley could have predicted. The two billionaires have publicly clashed for years, most memorably in 2023 when Musk challenged Zuckerberg to a physical cage match. Yet, the exponential rise of AI appears to have reshaped priorities, hinting at potential pragmatic alliances despite past rivalries.
What’s Next
As the court considers OpenAI’s motion to force Meta’s cooperation, the case underscores just how tangled the AI power struggle has become. With $97 billion at stake, rival corporate strategies, and the personal egos of tech’s biggest names on the line, the outcome could influence not only OpenAI’s future but the competitive landscape of artificial intelligence itself.
For now, the industry watches as legal filings and boardroom maneuverings add fresh drama to the AI arms race. Whether Meta remains a reluctant bystander or a key player in Musk’s attempted takeover could prove pivotal in shaping the next chapter of this global technology battle.
