Why the iPhone 17 Upgrade Doesn’t Make Sense in 2025
Every September, Apple fans face the same dilemma: should you spend over a thousand dollars on the latest iPhone, or stick with what you have? With the launch of the iPhone 17 lineup, including the standard model, the ultra-thin iPhone Air, and the high-end iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max, Apple once again promises its “best iPhones yet.”
But here’s the truth: for most users, upgrading this year simply doesn’t make sense. If you’re holding onto an iPhone 15 or 16, the differences are so incremental that your wallet is better off staying closed. Let’s break down why.
The “Too Good” Problem: Older iPhones Are Still Powerhouses
The iPhone 15 Pro Max, powered by Apple’s A17 Pro chip, remains an absolute beast in 2025. It runs apps like Safari, Instagram, and BlueSky flawlessly. Games still load with console-level performance. The phone still feels just as fast today as it did when it launched.
This creates what some tech reviewers call the “too good” problem: the hardware has become so advanced that it doesn’t age as quickly as older iPhones did. Two or three years ago, you’d start noticing lag or shorter battery life after a couple of major iOS updates. Yet, the iPhone 15 Pro Max powers through.
Yes, the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max bring the new A19 Pro chip, but will you notice the difference when opening everyday apps? Probably not. This mirrors Apple’s MacBook journey, where M1 chips were so good that users skipped the M2 and M3 generations, only considering upgrades with the M4.
Camera “Upgrades” Are More Like Side-Grades
Apple made a big deal about the iPhone 17 Pro’s new trio of 48-megapixel Fusion cameras, but let’s be honest: the iPhone 15 Pro Max already takes stunning photos. Whether you’re snapping cityscapes, vacations, or portraits, most users aren’t left wishing for more.
The one real upgrade is the telephoto zoom on the iPhone 17 Pro Max. But how often do you actually zoom in four times on a subject? Unless you’re a professional photographer or a dedicated hobbyist, that’s not worth dropping another $1,200.
Cheaper Fixes Beat Expensive Upgrades
Many people consider upgrading because of wear and tear. But here’s the smarter play:
- Battery dying too quickly? A replacement costs around $89–$99 at Apple. Much cheaper than a $1,000+ phone.
- Scratched screen? The new iPhones have Ceramic Shield 2, but you can just replace your current screen for far less.
- Entry-level temptation? Even the iPhone 16, now priced around $699, gives you 5G, Wi-Fi 7, USB-C, and a great camera system, making it a far better value than the base iPhone 17.
In other words, you don’t need a new iPhone; you might just need a repair.
The Bottom Line: Wait for 2026
Yes, the iPhone 17 lineup is sleek. Yes, the iPhone Air is thin and tempting. But performance, cameras, and durability just aren’t different enough from the iPhone 15 or 16 to justify the hefty price tag.
Even inside Apple’s own circles, fewer people are upgrading this year. That says it all.
The real value comes when you upgrade out of necessity, when your phone no longer meets your needs, not just for a “nice-to-have” feature. For most people, that moment won’t come until at least 2026.
So, unless you’re desperate for the latest and greatest, your best financial and practical decision is to skip the iPhone 17 upgrade this year.
Yes, all models in the iPhone 17 lineup (17, Air, 17 Pro, and 17 Pro Max) do feature the new Ceramic Shield 2 for better front durability. But again, that alone isn’t worth spending hundreds more.
